Liberals have generally supported the Warren Court rulings and they have, sometimes slowly, become more accepted over time, though, of course, not by everyone. It also was a highlight of the Warren Court, 1953-1969, in which Chief Justice Earl Warren's leadership lead the court in a number of cases which gave the accused and other lesser respected members of society greater protection by the law, interpreting the constitution in ways that those 'strict constructionists' (literalists) viewed as crossing the line into judicial activism. Those against this claim that it ties the hands of the police the general public has not always liked the ruling but would generally like one of their family members to have such protection should they be in a situation of being a potential accused. Police were very angry with the ruling, but historically it is generally viewed as appropriate as it guarantees freedom of speech and that self incrimination will not be used against an accused. The study is based on nine months of observation in an urban police department involving 122 interrogations and 45 detectives. Arizona on the behavior, attitudes, and culture of American police interrogators. It simply changed the nature of the accused-police relationship. The second of a two-part series, this article analyzes the long-term impact of the Court's ruling in Miranda v. Miranda was a groundbreaking case in the right of the accused to be read his rights before police questioned him.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |